lin8080 wrote:

Joann Evans schrieb:

Skybuck Flying wrote:

...

   And you think *we* talk bullshit?

   Strong, very directional radio waves are easy to generate, and some
parts of the spectrum (do a search on "SETI"+"water hole") are usefully
quiet.

   It's my understanding that the Aricebo readitelescope could
communicate with another device like itself on the other side of the
galaxy. If we had the will, we could build something even bigger/higher
gain in free-fall and/or on the Lunar farside. ETs that have radio at
all, likely could do even better.

Hallo

Now, here I type my thoughts about.
Your water-hole brings the initial up.

Why not searching in a duple water-frequency? Is there ever a search or
a look at 2,8xx Ghz?

Or, wouldn't it be more intelligent to use math. oriented freqs? May be
3,14.., named PI, or e, or phys. constants. It is not known to me, ever
heard about such things.

   You could. In the movie 'Contact,' their signal was at pi times the
hydrogen emission frequency.....


 

Just thought about, what frequency would you choose to be very
intelligent?

lin

-- 

   You know what to remove, to reply....