| Subject: Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? |
| From: Gary Cavie |
| Date: 14/10/2004, 21:17 |
| Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics |
In article <ckmlro$p2c$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>,
richard@microscitech.freeserve.co.uk says...
"Paul Cardinale" <pcardinale@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
<snip>
being created). However you can counter that counter-argument by
asking "Why is God trying to fool us?"
Paul Cardinale
I wouldn't bother asking , they'll have an answer to that an'all.
God's like that, 'he/she/it moves in mysterious ways'
I wish, when anyone questioned an assumption I made, I could simply reply,
'I move in mysterious ways' end of story!
Fantastic get-out clause, only God could have invented it - or a lawyer.
Sigh
you'd have thought Newton might have killed all the speculation, but sadly
not. 400 years later.
I always find it strange when I am told that God deserves praise for
creating all that is good in the world, but that all that is bad is the
fault of humans. Sounds a bit like marriage to me ;-)
Gary