| Subject: Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? |
| From: "richard miller" <richard@microscitech.freeserve.co.uk> |
| Date: 14/10/2004, 21:36 |
| Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics |
"Gary Cavie" <m0jjh@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bd8ef15d8ba9d0a98968d@news.individual.net...
In article <ckmlro$p2c$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>,
richard@microscitech.freeserve.co.uk says...
"Paul Cardinale" <pcardinale@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
<snip>
being created). However you can counter that counter-argument by
asking "Why is God trying to fool us?"
Paul Cardinale
I wouldn't bother asking , they'll have an answer to that an'all.
God's like that, 'he/she/it moves in mysterious ways'
I wish, when anyone questioned an assumption I made, I could simply
reply,
'I move in mysterious ways' end of story!
Fantastic get-out clause, only God could have invented it - or a lawyer.
Sigh
you'd have thought Newton might have killed all the speculation, but
sadly
not. 400 years later.
I always find it strange when I am told that God deserves praise for
creating all that is good in the world, but that all that is bad is the
fault of humans. Sounds a bit like marriage to me ;-)
Gary
'Marriage' - Take my mother in law... please
That said, over this side of the Pond, we hear about yesterdays Kerry Vs
Bush debate.
Apparently God got a look in. I really wanted to ask if they had a hotline
to him. They seemed very well informed, or at least in awe of his powers.
It's the same this side of the Pond too
I could rant on, better just to stick to the Science, its predictable.