Subject: Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?
From: "Benign Vanilla" <BVanillaREMOVE@tibetanbeefgarden.com>
Date: 15/10/2004, 18:06
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics

"Ray Vingnutte" <rvnospam@againnospam.our.uk> wrote in message
news:20041015153913.2601267b@darkstar.example.org...
<snip>
I hope Nightbat don't see this but here goes....

Have you read Dr. Nick Bostrom?

http://www.simulation-argument.com/

And his own site

http://www.nickbostrom.com/

Some fun reading, but I have skepticism for any theory that is proof of
everything with no verifiable answer.

BV.