Subject: Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?
From: baskitcaise
Date: 15/10/2004, 19:42
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics

Benign Vanilla adjusted his/her tin foil beanie and asbestos underwear
to write:


"Ray Vingnutte" <rvnospam@againnospam.our.uk> wrote in message
news:20041015153913.2601267b@darkstar.example.org...
<snip>
I hope Nightbat don't see this but here goes....

Have you read Dr. Nick Bostrom?

http://www.simulation-argument.com/

And his own site

http://www.nickbostrom.com/

Some fun reading, but I have skepticism for any theory that is proof
of everything with no verifiable answer.

BV.

ergo ?

:)

-- Mark Iligitimi Non Carborundum! Twixt hill and high water, N.Wales, UK onfxvgpnvfr-ng-tzk-qbg-pb-hx