| Subject: Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? |
| From: baskitcaise |
| Date: 15/10/2004, 19:42 |
| Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics |
Benign Vanilla adjusted his/her tin foil beanie and asbestos underwear
to write:
"Ray Vingnutte" <rvnospam@againnospam.our.uk> wrote in message
news:20041015153913.2601267b@darkstar.example.org...
<snip>
I hope Nightbat don't see this but here goes....
Have you read Dr. Nick Bostrom?
http://www.simulation-argument.com/
And his own site
http://www.nickbostrom.com/
Some fun reading, but I have skepticism for any theory that is proof
of everything with no verifiable answer.
BV.
ergo ?
:)
--
Mark
Iligitimi Non Carborundum!
Twixt hill and high water, N.Wales, UK
onfxvgpnvfr-ng-tzk-qbg-pb-hx