| Subject: Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO |
| From: Michael Davis |
| Date: 17/10/2004, 12:54 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,sci.physics,alt.sci.seti,sci.environment,talk.religion.newage,talk.atheism |
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Why am I not surprised to see you coming to bat for Little Tommy? Kooks
of a feather and all that I guess.
Michael Davis wrote:
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
"Tim K." wrote:
>>> Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
of which we as
a species and a civilization know almost nothing about, in global
scale,
certainly on cosmic scale.
There's that ego again - if *you* don't understand it, "we as a
species and
a civilization know almost nothing".
My claim wasn't based upon my understanding of any particular thing,
rather that
our totality of understanding of the cosmos and the planet Earth is
extremely
limited,
Really?
Hello Michael,
'Extremely' may not be quantified, how to you quantify it? Do we 'know'?
I don't have to quantify anything. I'm not the one claiming humans are
ignorant. I'd like to see Little Tommy quantify the "totality of
understanding" that he claims we are nowhere near achieving. How does he
know we aren't far closer to achieving that "totality" than we are to
the total ignorance of our origins? What benchmark is he using for
measurement? Is he comparing us to his imaginary alien saviors? I
wouldn't be surprised.
a claim that is trivially supported by the evidence
What evidence would that be...
I can't speak for Thomas,
Then don't.
--- Snip ---
--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously
attributed to P. T. Barnum)