| Subject: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? |
| From: Victor |
| Date: 18/10/2004, 14:37 |
| Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics |
Pierre wrote:
Don't forget Bush wants the end of Hubble and want s to deicde what's
good in science...
Actually it is NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe who decided that fixing
Hubble is not worth an astronaut's life or losing another shuttle. A
board of investigation was set up to determine the risks involved. I
personally think the risk is not that high and that a human service
mission should go ahead as planned.
Wrt. the US space program - I prefer Bush's Vision for Space
Exploration. From what I have read on Space.com, Kerry is still stuck
in a 'low-Earth orbit' research mentality. With Kerry as president,
space enthusiasts like us can kiss promising missions like the Jupiter
Ice Moons and Pluto-Kuiper Express missions good-bye.