Subject: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?
From: "Rick" <me@privacy.net>
Date: 18/10/2004, 19:55
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics

"beavith" <beavith1@netscape.net> wrote in message news:uqn7n09c3jsuts5shqjalrijbbudn44s0u@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:37:22 +0200, Victor <Victor@com.com> wrote:
>From what I have read on Space.com, Kerry is still stuck
in a 'low-Earth orbit' research mentality.  With Kerry as president,
space enthusiasts like us can kiss promising missions like the Jupiter
Ice Moons and Pluto-Kuiper Express missions good-bye.

oh, i dunno.  JIMO has enough coolness factor that it'd probably go.
however, you can rest assured that Bush's vision would die a fast
death.  the corollary is that NASA would remain rudderless until and
unless Kerry comes up with his own vision.  the impression that i get
is that its not even on Kerry's radar screen.
it'd be another 4 years down the drain.

Better NASA than the entire world.  The inside word on the
Hill is that W. has become mentally and emotionally unstable --
not the person we want having his finger on the button that
could start WWIII:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4636.shtml

Other reports include abuse of Xanax and other prescription
drugs, violent rampages, paranoid delusions etc etc.  Some
pretty damned scary stuff, reminiscent of Adolf Hitler.  At first
I wrote off these stories as election-year scare tactics, but the
more research I did the more credible they became.

Rick