"Thomas Lee Elifritz" <crackpots@everywhere.net> wrote in message
news:417314E1.1A5E9496@everywhere.net...

October 17, 2004

"Tim K." wrote:

I just learned a new kook method from Thomas - ignore a litany of points

and

post a link to some website that says something about argument by

authority.

You mean like :

http://www.physics.arizona.edu/physics/research/biophysics.html

Since apparently you haven't taken the time to read it yourself, let's
recapitulate :

"Ecological and Evolutionary: dynamics of Darwinian evolution, in vitro
evolution, population
dynamics in spatially-extended systems."

"The intellectual threads that are important in biological physics include
statistical mechanics, kinetic theory, hydrodynamics, continuum mechanics,
nonlinear dynamics and colloidal physics.

Ok, let's take a physics class to learn biology.

Watch how easy this is...

I'm a geneticist and I'm doing a series of experiments to map genes.  I have
no doubt you know how that would be done.  Tell me, oh great poster of
irrelevant weblinks who can say nothing by himself, how do I control for
quantum level effects?
How would *you* design the experiment?   hmmm...????
Here's your chance to shine.

I'm studying character traits in a ring species as I'm interested in the
role of reproductive isolation in speciation.  How do I control for the
uncertainty principle?  You design the experiment and make that subatomic
stuff relevant.  Idiot.

You are fucking kookstain, nothing more.  Deal with it.