| Subject: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? |
| From: Paul Lawler |
| Date: 20/10/2004, 09:02 |
| Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics |
"Rick" <me@privacy.net> wrote in news:2tj0nhF1vl96kU1@uni-berlin.de:
"Paul Cardinale" <pcardinale@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:64050551.0410181453.3a96fbf5@posting.google.com...
You may think the choices are bad now, but you ain't seen nuttin'
yet: next time it will be Hillary vs. Jeb.
Hey, if the Reps can't come up with a better candidate in the next
four years than Jeb Bush, then they deserve to lose. In fact I hear
Hillary is hoping Kerry loses next month, so she can take office in
2008 instead of 2012.
Actually in 2012, Hillary will be 65... since she was never what you would
call "good looking" to begin with, I doubt she will be electable in 2012...
so I suspect she's secretly praying for Kerry to lose.