Re: BOINC and Linux
Subject: Re: BOINC and Linux
From: Jan Allan Andersen
Date: 25/10/2004, 05:59
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

Martin 53N 1W wrote:

Better is to run boinc from a script or as a service. "Howto"s for these have been posted on the s@h boinc forum.

Must have a closer look at that :o)

All the boinc clients save checkpoints so that if they are interrupted, they can roll back to a recently saved point. Leaving the processes in memory saves wasting CPU time that would otherwise be lost by rolling back.

CP especially should be kept in memory!

I also have that, but again, if I have to close down my linux completely, will the WU's kept in memory be completely lost then?
Or will a script help that?

At the moment for s@h, quite a bit faster if you believe the screams from the Windows users. I suspect that some OS interaction is causing problems. The s@h developers are looking into whether the problems are real and what to fix.

I asked because it is my experience also, especially in regards to SETI2.
I have BOINC installed on my windows partition too, and it takes something like 6½ - 7, and more likely around 7, hours to complete a WU.
In linux, installed on a slower HD, it takes around 4½ hour to complete.


Regards,
Jan