| Subject: Re: BOINC and Linux |
| From: Jan Allan Andersen |
| Date: 25/10/2004, 05:59 |
Martin 53N 1W wrote:
Better is to run boinc from a script or as a service. "Howto"s for these
have been posted on the s@h boinc forum.
Must have a closer look at that :o)
All the boinc clients save checkpoints so that if they are interrupted,
they can roll back to a recently saved point. Leaving the processes in
memory saves wasting CPU time that would otherwise be lost by rolling back.
CP especially should be kept in memory!
I also have that, but again, if I have to close down my linux
completely, will the WU's kept in memory be completely lost then?
Or will a script help that?
At the moment for s@h, quite a bit faster if you believe the screams
from the Windows users. I suspect that some OS interaction is causing
problems. The s@h developers are looking into whether the problems are
real and what to fix.
I asked because it is my experience also, especially in regards to SETI2.
I have BOINC installed on my windows partition too, and it takes
something like 6½ - 7, and more likely around 7, hours to complete a WU.
In linux, installed on a slower HD, it takes around 4½ hour to complete.
Regards,
Jan