Subject: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?
From: Paul Bramscher
Date: 25/10/2004, 22:38
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.physics

Rick wrote:
"Paul Cardinale" <pcardinale@volcanomail.com> wrote in message news:64050551.0410181453.3a96fbf5@posting.google.com...

You may think the choices are bad now, but you ain't seen nuttin' yet:
next time it will be Hillary vs. Jeb.


Hey, if the Reps can't come up with a better candidate in the next
four years than Jeb Bush, then they deserve to lose.  In fact I hear
Hillary is hoping Kerry loses next month, so she can take office in
2008 instead of 2012.

Don't discount Dan Quayle.  After Shrub, Quayle might make a political comeback as an intellectual giant.