| Subject: Re: CPU heat & SETI (Good FAQ answer) |
| From: Peter Smithson |
| Date: 26/10/2004, 11:23 |
In article <T1098738901@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, david@djwhome.demon.co.uk
says...
In article <vX8fd.122$4k7.61@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>,
"Martin 53N 1W <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd>" <> wrote:
Peter Smithson wrote:
Traditionaly, computers execute an idle loop to keep them busy all the
time anyway. Computers with power saving features (usually laptops) will
work slightly harder since the power saving features will not work when
running SETI@home."
Nice summary.
Not really. It's basically still a gross oversimplification.
I think you're missing the purpose of the FAQ. Have a look at the other
answers - they are all very brief and non technical for normal people to
understand. Give your answer to Jo Bloggs and he'll give up after the
first two sentences. Even my programing collegues don't always know
what CPU cache is never mind L1 L2 etc. - they don't need to know.
Never mind a non technical person.
If someone knew enough about computers to understand your answer then I
suspect they would already know the answer!
The question was "Will running SETI@home put any additional strain on my
computer?". Your answer tells us things about L1 cache, PDP 11's and
CPU temprature in BOIS mode but doesn't actually give a yes/maybe/no
answer.
"More" does not equal "Better". The hard thing is to make a short
answer which provides the information normal users will want in an
understandable form. Sure it's not going to be 100% accurate but at the
moment the FAQ entry doesn't even mention the concept of power saving
which I think it should do as it's becoming increasingly popular.
Cheers