In article <T1098824592@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, david@djwhome.demon.co.uk 
says...

In article <vWvfd.246$D36.40@newsfe5-win.ntli.net>,
Martin 53N 1W <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote:

Peter Smithson wrote:

I think you're missing the purpose of the FAQ.  Have a look at the other 

I wasn't trying to provide content for the FAQ, I was trying to demonstrate
why the proposed answer, and the reasoning behind it, was unsafe.

Sorry - I suddenly realised that after I posted.  But we've already gone 
from the complex part.  The post before mine was to create a FAQ entry 
from a large amount of info.

What was wrong with the FAQ entry - I know it's simplified but what's 
inaccurate?

Cheers

Peter
-- 
http://www.beluga.freeserve.co.uk