"PG" <noonehere@nowhere.net> wrote

Anyone know how Sempron 3000+ Socket 462 512KB L2 cache
compare with the Bartons?

Sempron 'performance rating' (PR) apparently compares with _Celeron_ MHz 
whereas Barton PR compares reasonably well with P4 MHz - ie. a Sempron 3000+ 
is a lot slower than a Barton 3000+...

NB: I'm running a whole bunch of Socket A/462 CPUs. T'bred Bs & Bartons, but 
I haven't bought any Semprons, so I have not been able to a direct 
comparison myself - that Celeron/P4 information comes from looking at 
reviews on the 'net...

Ciao...

[UK]_Nick...
-- 
Nick M V Salmon  Master Mariner  MN(Retd.)
Email: My four initials at dsl dot pipex dot com
http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/index.htm