On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:45:30 -0000, "rcdriver"
<rcdriver22@uknets.co.uknojunk> wrote:

There seems to be substantial and even strong support for the old classic 
S@H. As this class results example confirms with WU crunchers are very much 
still active  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/classpages/days/2453252.html

>from the newer members and the hard core WU crunchers in my group. I cannot 

see how you would arbitrarily to turn off classic S@H to disenfranchise all 
these supporters.without some form of backlash.

Maybe there will be a move to "Save ET"!!??

Paul 

Science MUST evolve towards bigger and better things! Science that is
still looking for the wheel has long since become outdated!
Seti too must evolve, one of the ways is thru Boinc. Seti IS still
being done thu Boinc! Boinc just allows lots of other scientific
projects to piggyback along and users can choose which project or
projects they wish to crunch for! Yes new and exciting scientific
analysis is being done! Yes the data is being looked at in all new
ways! No the data is not being analysed by 20 different people just to
verify the result. Each unit is sent out to 3 people and if they all
come back with the same, or at least scientifically the same, then the
unit is classified as crunched and it is not sent out again. In
Classic, that is what regular Seti is called, the same unit could be
sent out 1000 or more  times if they were running low on units.

In short, join us over in Boinc or you will have to go elsewhere to
crunch! When will this happen, when Boinc has around 6000,000 users!
We are on a steady climb and the end is in sight, but it is not going
to be reached tomorrow!