Subject: Re: SETI based on wrong technique?
From: "Sbg" <*@*.telia.com>
Date: 03/01/2005, 17:25
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

"Stelv" <stelv@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ne-dnYifuK64TUXcRVn-vA@comcast.com...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but quanta would simply be the latin plural of
quantum.  Doesn't quantum mean a quantity, so quanta would be quantities?
Quantities of what, though, would be the question.  Or maybe he's talking
about using the Australian airlines to move things about?



Hi

"Believe any ET Communication is based on Quanta-technology.
This is the most effective and environmental healthy way to build
any sort of distance information transmission. Especially when
the amount of information, speed, distance and encryption
are units which are believed to exist in more advanced worlds."

QM = Quantum Mechanics
qt = quanta technology

THIS IS THE FUTURE WHICH ET WORLDS TRANSMIT INFORMATION WITH.
OK.

Quanta exists, yes some plural form of Quantum.
We all know this. So what's the fuss about?

Please argue, don't muck.

LeoK