On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:59:12 GMT, CeDeROM <cederom@_remove_tlen.pl>
wrote:

f/fgeorge wrote:

this is strange for me as 
i thought it would be the same project. 
are seti and seti@boinc two different prijects with the same name?

Yes they are two different projects crunching the same data.

are my results in seti the same 
results with seti@boinc? 

no they are different.

so i will stay with seti classic as it seems more stable
but i cant understand WHY THERE IS NO AMD64 VERSION OF SETI 
JET!!@#&@*(#$!@*($^!*($!@*(
:-(

Because the AMD 64 chip which is the most prevelent is not running 64
bit in the scientific calculations only in other parts. It WOULD NOT
be any faster to make a 64 bit Boinc or Classic client for the current
AMD chip.