SoT wrote:

*22 June 2004

True

*16 March 2005

True

*To be announced

Still true

*To be announced

Still true

*To be announced (1 April 2005 or later)

Still true (we're in the "or later" regime)

Current transition plan.  http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/transition.php

So what's "invalid" with all that?

Have you not noticed that NASA now quotes explicitly "not earlier than" dates?


Is this just an "Amerikan" thing about hangups about dates?

(Be very careful about what dating you do if going USA <--> rest of the world! (;-))

Cheers,
Martin