| Subject: The Iraq Conspiracy |
| From: "Raktizer Omheit" <cequka@iprimus.com.au> |
| Date: 26/04/2005, 07:05 |
President George Bush junior throughout 2002 and up until early April 2003
used to say that Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq possessed weapons of mass
destruction, that is, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. After the
failure to find these banned weapons in Iraq after the U.S. invasion of that
country in 2003, President George Bush junior alleged that perhaps these
banned weapons had been smuggled into Syria and Iran, nations that happen to
be Iraq's traditional enemies. Nevertheless, the embarrassing question for
the U.S.A. still remains, why are the Sunni Arab Iraqi guerrillas today not
using nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons against the American troops
in Iraq, by firing these weapons out of rocket-propelled grenades, mortars,
bazookas, and remote-controlled time bombs, human suicide bombers, and car
bombs. There are more than enough would-be suicide attack death squads among
the anti-American forces in Iraq. Was President George Bush genuinely duped
into believing that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, despite all the
espionage resources of the U.S. National Security Agency, Central Security
Service, Defense Intelligence Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation? Or perhaps George Bush junior knew all
along that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, and only pretended to be
shocked and surprised when no such weapons were found? Perhaps this feigned
shock and surprise was a Machiavellian means to an end, that is, an attempt
by The United States of America to seize control of the petroleum reserves
of the mostly Muslim Middle East? If the latter is true, then President
George Bush junior, the evangelical Christian, would be disqualified because
of St. Paul's teaching in I Corinthians 9:24-27. Jesus Christ would not use
the method of lying to achieve a good motive, even though President George
Bush junior in invading Iraq in 2003 might not have a good motive. Jesus
Christ said in Matthew 5:48 the following:
"Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect."
Consider these following statistics from Iraq : Why Did The USA Want "Regime
Change"?, by
KryssTal, in "http://www.krysstal.com/democracy_whyusa_iraq.html"
The Real Reasons?
Oil and Economic Control
The USA relies on oil to supply about 40% of its energy requirements, more
than any other source. Of this, 55% is imported oil. This percentage is
expected to rise to 65% in 2020 and to keep increasing. Much of the USA's
oil comes from the Gulf region. This region also supplies oil to most of the
world.
According to Michael T. Klare writing for the Interhemispheric Resource
Center: "This dependency is [a weakness] for American power: unless Persian
Gulf oil can be kept under American control, our ability to remain the
dominant world power would be put into question." Additionally, "Whoever
controls the Gulf automatically maintains a stranglehold on the global
economy."
Iraq has the second largest oil reserves in the Middle East. It has been
estimated that the Iraqi oil reserves amount to $ 1,100,000 million's worth
and can last for 130 years.
The table below from British Petroleum (BP) shows the estimated time that
various countries' oil fields are expected to last (as of 2002).
Country
Years
Country
Years
Iraq
128.98
Romania
16.01
Kuwait
127.70
Trinidad and Tobago
15.34
United Arab Emirates
114.81
Other Asia Pacific
15.13
Saudi Arabia
85.13
Oman
14.77
Iran
67.25
Republic of Congo
(Brazaville)
14.34
Azerbaijan
67.02
Ecuador
14.18
Venezuela
63.58
Thailand
14.17
Qatar
55.57
Uzbekistan
13.77
Other South and
Central America
41.21
Australia
12.56
Nigeria
30.41
Turkmenistan
12.47
Kazakhstan
27.71
Denmark
11.81
Cameroon
24.69
Malaysia
11.40
Italy
24.42
Syria
10.99
Yemen
23.08
Egypt
10.72
Mexico
21.52
USA
10.52
Brunei
21.05
Indonesia
10.21
Gabon
19.97
Argentina
9.85
Angola
19.44
Norway
8.02
Russian Federation
19.25
Colombia
6.44
Algeria
18.25
Canada
6.20
Brazil
18.09
United Kingdom
5.94
Other Former
Soviet Union
16.05
Vietnam
5.85
The table below shows the major fields in Iraq.
Oil Field
Contract Value
($ millions)
Daily production
(Barrels)
Al-Ahdab
700
90,000
Amara
300
80,000
West Qurna Phase I
380
200,000
West Qurna DS
190
65,000
North Rumaila Mishrif
160
250,000
Khurmala
1,300
200,000,000
Suba-Luhais
200
100,000
Hemrin
1,300
200,000,000
Zubair Mishrif
150
60,000
The reason France and Russia were wary of military action is that they fear
losing out on the post-Saddam oil bonanza.
A new regime would allow USA and UK oil companies concessions. James
Woolsey, a former CIA director told the USA newspaper, the Washington Post:
"It's pretty straight forward. France and Russia have oil companies and
interests in Iraq. They should be told that if they are of assistance in
moving Iraq toward decent government we'll do the best we can to ensure the
new government and American companies work closely with them".
Note the assumptions that American influence will be strong enough to decide
these matters, not the Iraqi government or people. The phrase "decent"
government means "compliant" government.
Grant Aldonas told a business forum that a war in Iraq "would open up this
spigot on Iraqi oil, which certainly would have a profound effect in terms
of the performance of the world economy for those countries that are
manufacturers and oil consumers".
The Americans use the nuclear-armed state of Israel in order to have a
relatively reliable ally to watch over the petroleum reserves of the mainly
Muslim Middle East, and the strategically important Suez Canal which gives
access to those oil fields. The American use of Israel reminds me of what is
said in Daniel 11:34:
"While the killing is going on, God's people will receive a little help,
even though many who join them will do so for selfish reasons."