Gary Heston wrote:

In article <ZUfBe.250$9a.217@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>,
Martin 53N 1W  <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote:

Jack wrote:

MrMike6by9 wrote:

But the question we have to ask ourselves, are we doing this for the
science or for bragging rights?...

Who cares? It's getting done.

It gets done better on Boinc-s@h.

At the moment, with Classic and SETIQueue, I can have 19 systems getting
49.8 results returned per day. Once Classic is shut down, I drop to one
system returning less than 2.7 results/day (BOINC being slightly slower
than Classic).

I'll stick with the higher volume as long as it lasts.

Cutting most of your figures in half I'm in a similar position,
although IIRC the cause in your case (Net access bottleneck?) is
different from mine (unsupported platform).

-- 
Odysseus 24# @ 49Y