Subject: Re: Quitting Seti
From: Roger
Date: 11/09/2005, 08:16
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:08:08 GMT, f/fgeorge <ffgeorge@yourplace.com>
wrote:

On 10 Sep 2005 07:49:49 -0700, "Ben" <Klikos@Cogeco.ca> wrote:

I'm just saying that I preferred the old competitive method. Why
couldn't that have been incorporated into Boinc? I'm all for progress
and improvement.
Treacan
The problem with the old competitive method is that it is/was NOT a
level playing field! Some people CHEATED!!!! Some were caught and they
had some numbers taken away, but NOT ALL WERE CAUGHT! There is no way
to catch them all! Your numbers may have been real but other peoples
numbers WERE NOT!
There IS a new set of numbers in Boinc, one is called RAC or returned
average credit, it is kind of like a speedometer in that it shows the
rate at which your credits are being granted. There is also Total
Credit, which is what the name implies, the total number of credits
you have in a particular project. EVERYONE starts at zero on both and

They do?  What happened to all the WUs I had that transfered over?

OH, and I finally gave up with the  3.2 Gig Athlon that couldn't
return or get WUs and removed BOINC.  This one is off as I have it
working so hard it doesn't have the resources available and that one
has an unknown problem be it here or there.  So I'm down to two out of
4 machines with the fastest two 3.4 Gig 64 Bit and 3.2 Gig 32 Bit
being used for every day stuff.  Seti/BOINC is left running on the 2.0
and 2.8 Gig XP Plus Athlons which are basically storage machines.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
goes up from there. The RAC flucuates depending on whether berkeley is
up and validating units but when it is up and running fine you will
get a good idea of how much of a  contribution you are making to the
whole. Obviously the faster or more machines you have the higher the
number.
Boinc has a MUCH more level playing field in that ALL results for a
particular unit are checked against a formula and the other people
that crunch your same unit. This means that if somone is cheating they
will likely get no credit for crunching that unit.