| Subject: Re: 'moonbounceing' or EME of ATSC or DVB-T UHF band TV signals: comments... |
| From: Doug Smith W9WI |
| Date: 01/10/2005, 13:35 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti,sci.engr.television.advanced,sci.engr.television.broadcast |
I think you're underestimating the signal strength side of the problem.
Simply
*detecting the presence* of an EME signal is a difficult step.
Max Power wrote:
================
In Europe there is a PAL system that uses only 5.0 MHz channel capacity.
NTSC-BSTC uses (technically) only 4.58 for vision, and comes in under 5.85
MHz ignoring 'guard bands'.
You can receive a stable and identifiable (analog) picture with
considerably less than 4MHz - I'd bet 1MHz would be enough bandwidth if
the identification slide was large enough. Still, that's about four
orders of magnitude wider than what the amateur experiments seem to be
succeeding with.
But when you go to ATSC digital you need the whole channel. (there's a
lot I don't know abut DVB-T but I strongly suspect it requires the whole
channel as well)
I would not expect the PAL signal to survive the trip intact, however.
Perhaps using NICAM to recover probabalistic sync intervals might work, but
recovery of the coluour signal (due to doppler and ionsphereic distortions)
I would classify as theoretically impossible -- unless you are using
AIRICEBO / CANBERRA / GLADSTONE.
A detailed systems analysis is needed to verify most of my assumptions, as
probably a few are wrong.
Given the attenuation issues I don't think many people have considered
what doppler, ionospheric distortions, and reflection irregularities
would do. I would imagine they would make things pretty difficult for
ATSC. Reception of analog signals via F-layer propagation usually
exhibits severe multipath, more than enough to render F-layer ATSC
reception almost certainly impossible. (E-layer, on the other hand, has
already happened)
I suppose the Arecibo dish may in fact be large enough to deliver enough
signal for NTSC analog reception.
Then, there's the issue Paul K. brings up: interference from multiple
stations on the same channel. The amateur experimenters are avoiding
this by using extremely narrow receiver bandwidths and predicting the
Doppler shift characteristics of specific target stations. This works
fine for resolving the presence or absence of a carrier. Much less so
once you open the bandwidth up to 1MHz or more and start having multiple
signals interleaving in the same spectrum!