In article <IsU9f.22776$Ce5.12149@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>, 
ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd says...

Richard wrote:

"Martin 53N 1W" <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote in message

[...]

The question is whether those rates are "real" or just bad reporting by
that router.

[...]

Try this:

http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/newcricket/grapher.cgi?target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Finr-668%2Fgigabitethernet0_0;ranges=d;view=Octets

I think the old
http://www.net.berkeley.edu:8885/~cricket/cricket/grapher.cgi?target=/router-interfaces/inr-668-interfaces/gigabitethernet0_0&ranges=d%3Aw&view=Octets
is for Berkeley only

Very curious...

fragment1 newcricket shows good clean data whereas the old cricket is a 
mess of dropouts.

A helpful redirect from the old to the new would be good!

Thanks for the link,

Regards,
Martin

I just checked, using the fragment1 url, and was redirected to the net url.

-- 
Claude