f/fgeorge wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:01:04 GMT, "JoeSP" <olegp@telus.net> wrote:

I don't mean to be an enemy of SETI, I find it fascinating to say the
least, but an increasing number of scientific minds are growing more and
more
critical of the project.  I was severely chastised in these groups for
merely stating the somewhat obvious.

I said that it was highly unlikely that efficient radio communication
would contain repeating elements, which is what SETI is mainly searching
for. Our own communications use a type of compression that takes out
repeating elements, thus making it appear more and more like random noise.

I also questioned the logic of an advanced civilization using radio
broadcasts into space as an efficient means of communication. 
Particle-beam signals would be vastly more efficient, but much harder to
detect by third parties such as ourselves.

Organisms in nature rarely broadcast their presence to the surroundings.
Organisms on other planets presumably follow the same laws of nature too.
Remaining incognito is what most organisms make great efforts to do.
Exceptions are those who want to mate, and take the calculated risk, but I
don't think any alien intelligence would be broadcasting radio signals
into space for such a purpose.

And perhaps most important of all is the tiny window in the vastness of
time and space that any intelligent civilization would be able to attempt
to
communicate with others in the universe.  The chances of finding a similar
civilization to ours, beaming out friendship signals in hopes of
connecting with another are probably as remote as two bullets colliding in
the air, shot from different sides of a mountain, on any given day in a
millenium.

All of this is why explains why Dr. David Anderson dreamed up and got
funding for the project and not you. If you have an idea that you
think will work by all means boil it down and try and get some funding
for it. Just remember that not all Scientific ideas are GREAT right
out of the box, some are interesting enough to be funded so they can
mature into something that is viable. One of the things Dr. Anderson
did was propose that he could convince totally unrelated people to
participate in the project, a concept called Distributed Computing! It
has worked waaaaay beyond anyones wildest dreams and as a result you
now see 10 active DC projects, with more coming all the time.
Just look at you as an example...you do not believe that the project
has any hope of success, but you are crunching!

Many, if not most, scientific tests fail.  The failures don't normally get
published but they help define the subject so that subsequent testing is
more likely to succeed.  You won't succeed unless you try.