| Subject: Re: SETI CLASSIC DOWN AGAIN. |
| From: "Lee Rieger" <leer@iinet.net.au> |
| Date: 03/12/2005, 18:33 |
Thanks for that. Will head there.
Cheers,
Lee
"f/fgeorge" <ffgeorge@yourplace.com> wrote in message
news:aee3p1du2dath46c94ag3410jhm472fru1@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:22:15 GMT, Johan Plane <johan.plane@telia.com>
wrote:
Lee Rieger wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the server is going to go back up gain? I have 100 -
odd
Seti WUs both at home and at work to uploadand it's builing up all the
time.
Cheers,
Lee.
Same here. I find it annoying that no information is given as to what's
happening over at Berkeley with the server for Seti Classic. Being
neglected
doesn't exactly make me more inclined to take the step over to Boinc. Even
if
they are few people in the staff, posting some official information as to
what's
going on couldn't be that much of a disturbance to their routines? Or
perhaps
the routine is to keep us unaware, which I have seen tendencies to in the
past.
We contribute to their science, but what do we get in return? Except for
the
warm fuzzy feeling of perhaps doing something good - not much. I'm getting
pi..ed off by such attitudes. Just think of the electricity cost for all
of us
crunchers that they don't have to pay. For me alone it's about $1500 on a
yearly
basis from my own wallet. Non-deductable of course. At least one could
expect
some respect from Berkely for that sum.
/ Johan
Matt Lebofsky reset the server, it had crashed. The question was asked
and answered on the Boinc boards, remmeber the place we are going to
be going to. One of the things the Berkeley people are trying is to
direct everyone over there to ask questions and look for the answers.