Subject: Sharing the cost of an interstellar link
From: "Bj&#65533;rn Damm" <bjornd.invalid@rixmail.se>
Date: 03/12/2005, 12:53
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

Sharing the cost of an interstellar link

The receiving end would have the benefits of a transmission link. They would have the nice pictures and the information. The sponsors of the project would be able to make their ET movies, sell their ET books, ET toys, ET hamburgers and ET soda.

The economy at the transmitting side would be more problematic.
- Hey dude! We have this marvelous transmission project. We will transmit a message into space and we could have a reply within 1000-160000 years or at least within 4 million years. How many millions do you want to donate?

It is a risk the president on planet Xnorb would rapidly cut the funding to ASAN's transmission project in an attempt to fulfill his promise to lower taxes. But the transmitter has to be kept on for several thousand years to make it possible for a planet with a newly developed radio technology (like ours) to detect the signal.

The receiving end would probably have to pay for a much larger part of the link cost then the transmitting side, to make a link possible.

Is it possible at all, to have a transmission project at a cost so low it can be kept alive for several thousand years? The transmissions has to be made towards tens of millions of stars where somebody might be listening thousands of years after the transmissions were made.

Is it possible to still have enuf information contents in the signal to make it interesting to receive?