"Fujikawa Yamamoto" <michael.jackson.is.a.pervert@wacko.jacko.org> wrote in 
message news:Xns9722153EFFFA789FAED@204.153.244.170...

On 03 Dec 2005, gheston@hiwaay.net (Gary Heston) posted some
news:11p3prh7t4lj4b8@corp.supernews.com:

In article <aee3p1du2dath46c94ag3410jhm472fru1@4ax.com>, f/fgeorge
<*> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:22:15 GMT, Johan Plane <johan.plane@telia.com>
wrote:

Lee Rieger wrote:

Does anyone know if the server is going to go back up gain? I have
100 - odd Seti WUs both at home and at work to uploadand it's
builing up all the time.

I have 45 results waiting plus 116 kicked back as duplicates that SETI
Queue will hopefully get delivered via retries.

Same here. I find it annoying that no information is given as to
what's happening over at Berkeley with the server for Seti Classic.
[ ... ]

Based on their past workload, I don't count on much information. I
suppose they're a bit tired of maintaining Classic at this point,
anyway.

Matt Lebofsky reset the server, it had crashed. The question was asked
and answered on the Boinc boards, remmeber the place we are going to
be going to. One of the things the Berkeley people are trying is to
direct everyone over there to ask questions and look for the answers.

I'm still seeing a problem--I can download a unit on occasion, but
none of the results are going up nor are the "duplicate" results.

And as I typed this, it went to 44 results / 117 "duplicates".


Gary

I get an "invalid response from server" from Setiqueue when trying to
upload results.  Because of the invalid response, the result is not
deleted from Setiqueue.  Once that happens, the result is flagged as a
dupe next time around and my totals are going backwards when it trys to
upload the dupe.  They screwed something up.

Same here. But at least the server has accepted the backqueue of results. 
I'll just leave SetiQueue run and hope for the best.

I'll have to do the same at work as there are heaps of finished WUs waiting 
to get uploaded.

Cheers,
Lee.