On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:02:59 GMT, "Ed" <ed@home.com> wrote:

"Roger" <Delete-Invallid.stuff.groups@tm.net> wrote:

64 Meg?  I didn't think even Win 2K would run on that, or that MS
even made any apps that could.

Windows 2000 works fine in 64 MB, and providing you run only
the services you need, it is actually more memory efficient than
Win98 on the same hardware.

I still have two full copies of 2000, but I never ran it on less than
256 Meg and generally on 500.  I usually run at least 3 or 4 apps at a
time.

Although it uses more memory, I find XP Pro to be more stable and much
easier to use with PnP although 2000 has PnP if you turn it on.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com