Sending and receieving via Classic. Poblems is the developing of duplicate 
files. I think Gary Heston is right about that extra  line of info info in 
every WU being sent out. They are all deffinitely duplicating! Not a 
problem, just stripping the duplicates out. Main thing is, that we are 
getting credits for the completed work units.

I hope the guys at Berekley consider this. I certianly hope it eases their 
workload considerably.

If Setic Classic choofs along on its own, and runs okay most of the time, 
leave it run. Maybe some of the other peeved uses may migrate back to it. 
This will take MORE load off the BOINC project and possbly quicken the fine 
tuning of the project.

That's TWO thoughts today (I'd better have a lie down!!)
Views, please form the cruncing brethen.
Views, please from the programming bretheren.

Cheers for now,
Lee.


"Darrel Toepfer" <spambait@whodat.net> wrote in message 
news:zeqnf.31616$cA2.23480@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Lee Rieger wrote:

As there seems to be a heck of a lot of teething problems going on with 
BOINC at the moment, would it be possible to leave Seti Classic 
operational and not cut it off by December 15?

I believe there still are a few hundered thousand working off Seti 
Classic. This may take some of the weight off the BOINC project, just 
until the teething problems have been ironed out.

Just a thought.

Can neither send in results nor download work units via Classic at the 
moment. Looks like I'll be shutting down earlier than promised...