| Subject: Re: Definitely a religion |
| From: "JoeSP" <olegp@telus.net> |
| Date: 30/12/2005, 07:20 |
"uray" <remove-uray@att.net> wrote in message
news:ZtIqf.334903$zb5.10887@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"JoeSP" <olegp@telus.net> wrote in message
news:Senpf.29188$h86.143@edtnps89...
Author Michael Crichton, in a 2003 lecture at CalTech, stated that "The
Drake equation cannot be tested and therefore SETI is not science. SETI
is unquestionably a religion."
True to form for a religion, the less you know about it, the more
interesting it is. The list of problems with SETI is now so long, I
couldn't bring myself to waste the watts of electricity needed to run the
SETI software.
Well, he's right that SETI isn't really science. It's a search that uses
a lot of science, but SETI itself isn't science. It's a search for
neighbors!
I used to think it was fun, but now I just think it's like trying to find a
bedbug with a telescope.