| Subject: Re: Is anybody getting WU's for BOINC SETI? |
| From: DwarfPPE2004@swissonline.ch (Ulysse Keller) |
| Date: 30/12/2005, 00:12 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti |
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:02:47 +0100, Lars Bausch
<lars.bausch@dotsch.de> wrote:
Hello !
Ulysse Keller wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:36:10 GMT, "uray" <remove-uray@att.net> wrote:
(...)
%% 15.12.2005 00:48:36||Couldn't resolve hostname
%% [setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu]
(... end of this messages quoting)
I don't understand why 'setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu' is not found ...
Look like a problem with the nameresoulution. You can test it with a
"nslookup setiathome.berkeley.edu"
I have tried this (in a "DOS box"). This is what I get:
Server: dns-cache-la1.sunrise.ch
Address: 194.230.1.71
Nicht autorisierte Antwort:
Name: setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu
Addresses: 128.32.18.152, 128.32.18.151
Aliases: setiathome.berkeley.edu
(... end of nslookup answer ...)
Comment: the line after the blank one is a German line probably due to
my Windows (XP home) being in G., it seems to me that it means that
what follows is not quite 'official' - or something like that.
Litterally: "not authorized answer" (may-be not exactly, my English
might be not good enough and the ambiguities might differ in both
languages.) But may-be this is not important.
Now, question to you: what follows for my problem ? My impression
is that my connection, my internet access (= internet provider etc.)
and my internet options are such that there should be no problem
in this context, i.e. the nslookup-answer seems to show 'all OK'.
Please understand that I am more or less a newbie for what concerns
such 'low-level' internet commands like ping, nslookup and the like.
In fact I don't even know where they are documented.
(...)