Brad Guth wrote:

Our "Max Power" friend must go through the peer review process to show
that his ideas have substance and are "usefully interesting". The first
step to try that would be an invitation from him/her on here for his/her
detailed proposals to be considered.

I'm very soft and tame and kindly compared to the ruthless thoroughness
of the reviewers for those big journals.

So, exactly when if ever are you going to lift your "tame and kindly"
finger for the likes of "Mac Power", for myself or on behalf of anyone
that actually gives a tinkers damn about something that's potentially
important to science and thus to humanity?

Read and follow the very first sentence there. Sorry but your own fingers must do the walking!

_Clearly_ _demonstrate_ the "important to science and thus to humanity" and you should gain a lot of positive attention.


(Note for "Max Power": Pretentious 3rd person abstract speaking with random jargon is useless. Describe it all directly as it is and in as few words as is required for completeness. No more, no less. Be accurate.)

Regards,
Martin