| Subject: Re: Downtime vs uptime |
| From: f/fgeorge |
| Date: 26/02/2006, 20:52 |
Thread hijacked!!!!! Please STOP!
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:34:23 +0100, "Martine CAMPO"
<martine.campo@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Please, help me, it's impossible to create my account at the moment, is
there any problem on server?
Martine CAMPO
EMAIL : martine.campo@wanadoo.fr
"Gary Heston" <gheston@hiwaay.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
11tj04e97piqp57@corp.supernews.com...
In article <7ljht1tjb57rla8aj66i76k74meijksgbu@4ax.com>, f/fgeorge <*>
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:42:39 GMT, Johan Plane <johan.plane@telia.com>
wrote:
It seems as if there is more downtyime for maintenance that uptime for
us users at the moment. The redundancy seems to be somewhat lacking in
my opinion.
My guess would be that you came late to Seti then, Classic had MANY
MANY downtimes in the beginning. Do you remember when the people stole
the piece of copper cable that was the ONLY connection to Berkeley?
They were down for almost a week, trying to figure out what was wrong
and then trying to fix it. [ ... ]
Actually, the connection itself was fiber. It was bundled in with some
copper cable; the thieves just cut through everything to haul it out
faster. The site of the theft was also hilly terrain, and the repairs
were delayed further by rain.
Fortunantly, SETI Queue was holding a weeks worth of WU for me...
I haven't heard if the thieves were ever caught.
Gary
--
Gary Heston gheston@hiwaay.net I don't need an iPod, I have an IQ.
A worthwhile endeavour:
http://www.thebrestcancersite.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/CTDSites