Alonzo wrote:

<snip>

2. berkeley made a statement about this case and said that it is not
illegal to use this but without sourcecode it is illegal to distribute
it in the future (but the sourcecode is the same - no changes, so this
would be no problem)

<snip>

What some were going to do was get all the 'versions' they could and re-distribute them, but they figured they couldn't without the sourcecode.

So if he (Crunch3r) used Harolds sources and provided a link; all someone would have to do to re-distribute is use the same link to the sources. Right??

Just thinking out loud ... um.. err.. silently actually ;)