On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:44:11 GMT, Tazz <dmswaine@ns.sympatico.ca>
wrote:

Alonzo wrote:

<snip>

2. berkeley made a statement about this case and said that it is not
illegal to use this but without sourcecode it is illegal to distribute
it in the future (but the sourcecode is the same - no changes, so this
would be no problem)

<snip>

What some were going to do was get all the 'versions' they could and 
re-distribute them, but they figured they couldn't without the sourcecode.

So if he (Crunch3r) used Harolds sources and provided a link; all 
someone would have to do to re-distribute is use the same link to the 
sources. Right??

Just thinking out loud ... um.. err.. silently actually ;)

as crunch3r said, there is no difference in sourcecode, so i think
this would be ok.
but lets see how long we can use his version before berkeley makes
changes and 5.12 will not get new work then.

regards