| Subject: Re: New WU's bigger or ... ? |
| From: f/fgeorge |
| Date: 17/06/2006, 22:46 |
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:30:02 GMT, "Eric" <none@nospam.not> wrote:
"Eric" <none@nospam.not> wrote in message
news:VZWkg.74635$YI5.17056@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
... is there just more crunching going on?
I normally pay very little mind to Boinc, other than just allowing it to
keep on doing it's thing, but just noticed that all my computers (Win and
Linux) are now crunching "setiathome_enhanced" WU's for the last few
weeks.
Completion time for the "setiathome_enhanced" WU's is much longer than
what they were all crunching before.
Just curious...
Er, after reading another post about the same thing, I looked at some of the
logs and found that most of "setiathome_enhanced" completion times were
actually pretty close to what they were before -- but there were also quite
a few that took a very long time...
The enhanced units hsould be taking MUCH longer, as a general rule.
The reason is because the software is doing a MUCH mroe indepth look
of signals. We have already procesed "the" unit, so we will probably
have to do all the units over again too. Just in case you start LOTS
of older units. There is a batch coming thru now but they are ones
that had alot of noise in them when first checked, very superficially,
and were not ever evaluated by Classic.