| Subject: Re: Is this group still alive? |
| From: Odysseus |
| Date: 29/10/2007, 03:44 |
In article <13i97m3hemdlb50@corp.supernews.com>,
gheston@hiwaay.net (Gary Heston) wrote:
<snip>
That's pretty much my situation. Without a full time connection and the
equivalent of SetiQueue, I can't do much with BOINC.
That shouldn't be the case: BOINC does its own queuing. You can tell it
you only connect every week or whatever, and it'll download an
appropriate amount of work each time -- after a 'training' period while
it figures out how much time it actually gets to run during a given
interval, and how your CPU's crunching performance differs from the
benchmarks.
Some S@h tasks have deadlines of only a few days (but they range up to
several weeks), so having only a week between connections could be a
problem when a batch of these 'shorties' comes out. Most other BOINC
projects have more consistent deadlines.
However, if you can connect for a few minutes every couple of days
(which allows at least a day or so to 'call back' if the servers are
down) you shouldn't have any trouble making use of your spare CPU cycles
in the meantime.
--
Odysseus