Hi

It's good to see you all, still hanging around alt.sci.seti and
sci.astro.seti  newsgroups.

I haven't been here for while and really, didn't expect any activity by now.

My small farm stoped with production on Thu Dec 22nd  2005 sending wery last

3920th work unit at 00:19:40 UTC and finished on 5th place in my Class of
May 16th  2003

      Name (and URL)
     Z Jacob Krolo

      Results Received
     3920

      Total CPU Time
     3.541 years

      Average CPU Time per work unit
     7 hr 54 min 43.7 sec

      Average results received per day
     4.06

      Last result returned:
     Thu Dec 22 00:19:40 2005 UTC

      Registered on:
     Fri May 16 10:13:02 2003 UTC


     View Registration Class

      SETI@home user for:
     2.647 years

      Your group info:

      You do not currently belong to a group.

      You are not currently the founder of any teams.




      Your rank: (based on current workunits received)

      Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:
     95231st place.

      The number of users who have this rank:
     25

      You have completed more work units than
     98.248% of our users.




Well, to be honest, only 37  crunchers at that point left in my class.

Does anybody remember the final snapshots;

Jacob

                          --------------------------------------------------
---------------------

Stephen M wrote  on Jan 5, 2006 at 21:51;   The class pages have been
recalculated today.

My class page of August 4, 2001 is down to a whole 25 people.

Guess this is the final snapshot.
I hope they run the pages again without the filter for the last 4 weeks so
we can see EVERYONE in the class and how they did.  That would be neat.
Stephen

and Ginai answered on Jan 5, 2006 at 22:13 ; My class is down to 47 people
(myself included).  And I fully agree with you, it would be neat to have a
last look at my reg. class without the "inactive" filter.
Nevertheless...  THANKS TO WHOMEVER TOOK THE TIME TO LET THE REG. CLASS
SCRIPT  RUN!! :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@yahooligans.co.nz> wrote in message
news:4727d11a$1@news2.actrix.gen.nz...

Somewhere on the interweb "Whipple" typed:

Hi Whipple, good to see you!

Things have changed so much around here since the "Classic" days.
(Remember Carolyn's Clinic?)

I do indeed.

It is good to see you still hanging in
there and doing what you can.

Likewise. :-)

Misfit I remember your posts on getting
the most out of your existing system.

Still doing the same thing. I bought an E4500 Core 2 Duo and, with a bit

of

scotch tape and conductive paint, have it running at 2.93GHz instead of
2.2GHz. Other than having a smaller L2 cache my NZ$220 CPU is operating at
the same speed as a NZ$1,500 CPU. (Core 2 Extreme X6800).

Like yourself, I am looking around at my dated equipment and
considering an upgrade soon. I have been using BOINC under Win98 and
WinME and these old systems are slow, but at least they are doing
something with unneeded CPU cycles.

My souped-up system is doing five times the work that my previous best
system, (essentaily) an Athlon XP3200+ at about the same electricity
consumption. It's in fact doing more work than my previous best 6 PCs
combined. Saving electricity, and just maybe, helping to save the planet.

I think the group is very much alive albeit a much smaller, quieter
group.

Great!

My four computer farm is still plugging away as it has since
1999.

Good work! Great to see you still here.

Cheers,
-- 
Shaun.

"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@yahooligans.co.nz> wrote in message
news:472702ef@news2.actrix.gen.nz...

Somewhere on the interweb "Gary Heston" typed:

In article <47243707@news2.actrix.gen.nz>,
~misfit~ <misfit61nz@yahooligans.co.nz> wrote:

(Wondering why I didn't see Gary's post first. Perhaps it's a
propogation thing although it's been a while now...)

Nobody has ever been able to fully understand newsgroup
propagation. :-)

Indeed. I see two posts from you now, but still don't see the older
ones. <g>
--
TTFN

Shaun.