On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:23:48 -0800, MakeNoAttemptToAdjustYourSet
<DoNotAttemptToAdjustYourSet@anytime.org> wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:11:12 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:33:27 -0800, MakeNoAttemptToAdjustYourSet
<DoNotAttemptToAdjustYourSet@anytime.org> wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:18:32 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:33:14 -0800, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:25:41 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

I see we have an ambiguity over the meaning of "interfere"

EM waves in space pass right through each other without interacting.
As someone noted, this is why we can see the stars.

A wave "interferes" with a copy of itself at a detector; this is phase
addition/cancellation. 

John

 And your lazy fucktard ass had to quote the entire thing to write that?

 The word for today is "mixer".

Chairman? Sky Pilot? Gosh, you do have superhero fantasies.

John

 "Gosh"?  Grow up, you fucking retard.

Be a Real Man and use your real name.

 Fuck off.  You want access to me so bad?  We can set up a meeting.  You
may be disappointed with what a real man brings to the table, however.

How would you preserve your anonymity? Wear a bag on your head? Wear a
dress?

John