| Subject: Re: The Fermi Paradox and SETI Success |
| From: Robert Carnegie |
| Date: 15/08/2008, 12:47 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur,alt.sci.seti,alt.sci.planetary,talk.origins |
On Aug 15, 3:20 am, j.wilki...@uq.edu.au (John Wilkins) wrote:
Paul J Gans <g...@panix.com> wrote:
In talk.origins John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> wrote:
...
Yes, one solution would be for all civilizations to render themselves
undetectable very soon after becoming detectable. This assumes they
don't go in for travel or communication, and never make noticeable
changes to their habitat (like Dyson spheres and such). It seems to me
that this assumption would require humans to be a very unusual sort of
intelligence, because we're going to go in for communication and travel
as soon as we figure out how, if we don't collapse first.
Other civilizations might well be signalling us like mad using
techniques we've not yet invented.
Or techniques we have abandoned? Semaphores?
No, John, the constellation Flagellum ("The Semaphorist") merely
coincidetntally has the /appearance/ of a humanoid figure making
exaggerated gesture-signals. Actually it is a natural formation.
For more examples see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tainted_Love#Soft_Cell_version
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbreaker_(will.i.am_song)
depending upon generation.
(I wonder what Sean would make of it.)