Re: The Fermi Paradox and SETI Success

On Aug 15, 7:23�am, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net>
wrote:

Chris.B wrote:

On Aug 15, 1:18 am, John Harshman mumbled:

That was Chris. B's second bizarre, stream-of-consciousness post in this
thread. What newsgroup does he/she usually live in, and is he/she always
like that?


Third. Can someone answer my question?

[snip]


Looks like he recently has posted to alt.bible and alt.astro.amateur
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=d2U50w8AAAAiJDwXyuFA0CbdjKiggdp6

Here in an alt. bible post he responds to someone quoting Genesis. He
is no friend of creationists, but it's not very clear what he's saying
here, either, except the tone of disdain is clear.

"Your sources are propagandist fiction dealing with non-historical
figures invented by authors prone to severe hallucination,
schizophrenia or chronic substance abuse. (or worse) Given the
superstitious subject matter and the number of offspring claimed one
must question the value to the gene pool of such inbreeding. It
certainly explains our present plight on the brink of mass extinction
by the destruction of our only habitatable environment thanks to rules
laid out by these mentally unstable, stone age, desert dwelling
authors. You'd think mentally ill hippies with a death insurance scam
would get the bum's rush these days. But many are still able to
exploit this corrupt fiction to ensure an easy life for themselves.
Where gainful employment for these parasitic insurance salesman can be
safely avoided for their entire lives. Unfortunately the gullible and
uneducated amongst us will still believe in almost anything rather
than face the awful reality of how our world has been stolen from us.
Just to support a few in obscene luxury at the expense of the rest of
us. You couldn't make it up. Well they did. And now look at the mess
we are in! "

Whereas in his posts in this thread he seems to be blaming Swedish
socialists for bribing Osama bin Ladin to bomb the twin towers in
order to protect global corporate interests, which I find counter-
intuitive. Perhaps if he offered cites and reasoning I'd find him more
persuasive. Or perhaps not.

Kermit