The Judeo-Christian Standard Model

    Now that the Judeo-Christian movement has really reared its ugly head, with Lady Rothschild and Joe the Plumber leading the way, not to mention the Palin's of the North and Switchy Joe Lieberman bringing up the guard, along with government media news (aka:  Fox News), along with CBS, NBC and ABC, aka., The Evening Jews, plain ordinary Americans, like the secularists Ben Franklin, Tom Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and Hamilton, along with an innocent scattering of heathens and pagans, are now really in for it!
    That's what happens when a great nation of people running away from Euro culture, seeking liberation from religion, become eventually overtaken again by religious oppression.  I'm not kidding you, the dollars I now pay at the pump, not to mention a skidding economy, are all the result of a religious war in the Middle East.  Who gains the most?  The Jew and the Christian, not the heathen.
    The whole idea that the nation of Israel belongs in the Middle East for both historical and sacred reasons defies sensibility, as well as historical accuracy and philosophical equity.
    In Hawaii, the first woman governor happens to be Jewish, and she refers to the displaced indigenous native Hawaiians as homeless.  But quite worse, in her own righteous justification enforces laws to force them to abandon their humble dwellings, wherever that might be.
    With the second sweep of the hands, native Hawaiians are cast out and off properties now labeled public parks!  This is after the United States Marine Corps first came through over one hundred years ago, forcibly displacing the Hawaiian people under the guise of diplomatic-royal accord.
    The inequity is this.  Both Hawaiians and Jews claim historical precedence to homeland, yet the Jewish Governor of Hawaii, who makes occasional sojourns to the Holy Land to see how things are going:  the restoration of Hebrew occupancy, seeks not the same for her own political subjects, namely the restoration of Hawaiian occupancy.
    Philosophically, one may conclude that if a Jewish Governor claims Hawaiians as homeless, anyone who is non-Jewish should be allowed to claim Israelis as homeless and without recourse to restoration of their occupancy in the Holy Land.
    If one claims that Jehovah as god overrides Pele as goddess over the heathens, then they are full of Flit!
    What we have is heathens who are forced to share a war burden, who have little chance of rising to political office, who are forced to fight for Judeo-Christian cause without the reverse being true, and along with most Americans, share the burden of a dashed economy and American dream.
    It is also the execution of the Judeo-Christian Standard Model: the overriding of significant democracies through the subterfuge of religion and ethnicity, which is already happening.  So what can we do, as Americans, to stop it?
    First, we must disclose the extreme danger of the influence of specialized associations, who particularly claim moral superiority to other groups within the democratic system.  At the same time, the judiciary must always recognize all cases as potentially of unique import to moral and religious opinion and doctrine, inclusive of Constitutional Law, and steadfastly stand against any and all issues
of this sort, such as prayer in school, public monuments, oaths of office citing divine authority, nakedness and nudity in public, public dress, restrictions concerning language, religious displays, religious symbols, religious dress and uniforms, religious appropriations directed to faith based organizations and causes, health and safety codes based on religious custom or doctrine, such kosher definition, and special privileges and sanctions given to religious groups.
    In addition to this, since it is virtually impossible to abate the effects of religious teaching and association at the electoral and business level, a democratic government should disallow religious
teaching in public schools in order to strike a more equitable philosophical balance among its citizens.

    In reference to religious schools, such as parochial schools and synagogues, the reduction or elimination of the tax base should be restrictively applied, so that such organization may not expand
unduly or acquire inordinate wealth and property over and above the average citizen;  the government always actively engaged in the equalization of such taxes.
    Not only does the Judeo-Christian Standard Model intrude at the sociopolitical level, it has cleverly intertwined itself in science, by artificially restoring the philosophical schism between expectation and method.
    Religion is of course the aspect of philosophical expectation, such as the believe in Creationism, whereas as science is the aspect of philosophical methodology:  aka., the scientific method.
    It is when both aspects come together, confirming expectation, such as the Big-Bang hypothesis. This is of course as good as it is bad.
    If the conclusion neatly draws both aspects together, this is good.  The potential bad is when these conditions accelerate and modify methods in support of these conclusions;  the chance of then detecting invalidity greatly diminishes with each new layer of proof, as does the desire to go back and reevaluate earlier premises.  What comes to my mind in stating these concerns are the incredible number of fudges employed, from the earliest time temperature predictions in 1946 by George Gamow to the most recent suggestions by Alan Guth in the attempt to provide adjustments to the Higgs field.
    In all fairness, the Higgs field belays the presence of the anticipated Higgs boson, or what to some, and not too unexpectedly, call the God Particle, in of course the religio-scientific explanation that God is behind the scenes in these matters.  Don't forget that scientists are drawn from the masses of earthlings, 97% of which are religious.
    Most decidedly, one must confess that there must be some decidedly biased methodology at work here.  This is of course unapparent to most, because the bias is not a fixed bias, nor a bias concerning specific outcomes, but one which incorporate variable logical premise.
    For example, Albert Einstein was first principally an ontologist; viewing things from this perspective.  Later, he dropped the trappings of an ontologist;  viewing space-time mathematically, assuming a more closely corresponding role to that of topologists, employing some of the principles of analysis situs.  In the process, there might be tendencies to disregard those methods in less vogue, such as the ontologists pursuing luminiferous ether.
    In fact, Einstein was so immersed in his new approach, he totally disregarded reports about luminiferous ether as late as 1930.
    Today, as we look back, we don't recognize the presence of this bias, because space-time seems so right on.
    But in the case of Higgs and Guth, somewhat whimsical variations of the scientific method remain, especially concerning particle theory, especially when Guth himself declares permitted variance from physical law is permitted in these very theoretical matters, an almost echo of Einstein declaring common sense is out the window.
    Playing devil's advocate, allow me to be a very stubborn logician, insisting that long ago Democritus blundered badly when he investigated earth, wind, fire and water, through the utilization of the water drop experiment.   Thusly so, taking on the mantle of Guth and Einstein, I claim Democritus mad a bad mistake, an invalid logical choice, which has cascaded right down to this very day in the study of high energy physics, which the Euro physicists persistently following at the
overrated and overpriced CERN!
    Confidently enjoying the corpuscle theory of light by his predecessors, Democritus was really sure that between the newly discovered atomoi of water, lay nothing, keeping such atomoi distinctly
apart.
    Logically though, if nothing existed between atomoi, atomoi must be touching.  Not picking up on this, particles were conceived as spinning through space, a space Albert Einstein thought to be imparted by particles themselves.  Of course, strictly thinking, it is all wrong. And of course, whether we like it or not, we must be strict in our thinking.
    Nothing is nothing;  not a bubbly syrup of quantum foam, or ylem for that matter.  If particles are always in contact, then things like the Principle of Uncertainty, momentum and inertia are meaningless, as is the search for these ubiquitous and rather expensive babbles.
    But as part of the stumbling and bumbling Judeo-Christian Standard Model, it is quite useful for job security, recognition and the sowing of ignorance, the latter all designed to keep the masses in check and balance, so that Jehovah may rule supreme, with the Jew on His left and right, and the Christians kneeling at His feet.
    So as you might get a grip on yourself and sort all this out, I've left you a gateway to advanced t