Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:

DaveT <svirtftcyt@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:mk3gu4d9j544b1vrdvlov7lu853gu850m9@4ax.com: 

Maybe someone will invent a special card that is just for SETI. 

Not sure if Seti will run on it, but... a supercomputer on
your desk...

http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_computing_solutions.html

My GPU is so much faster than the CPU that I don't see the 
point in using the CPU for SETI.

To do even more work? I suppose if your GPU is so far advanced

>from your CPU (like a 486?), I see your point.

Brian

Now that I have all three running concurrently, I would say the 
CPU's and the GPU are roughly even. The CPU's are faster than I 
realized. When I first started running Seti 10 years ago in June, 
it was on a Cyrex 50. Not exactly a 486, but close. In 1996 I 
upgraded from my 386 to help run Doom better.