| Subject: Re: SETI and The Fermi Paradox |
| From: walksalone |
| Date: 20/09/2009, 21:24 |
| Newsgroups: alt.atheism,sci.astro.amateur,alt.sci.seti,alt.astronomy |
Morten Reistad <first@last.name> wrote in
news:6k4io6-ed3.ln1@laptop.reistad.name:
In article <h946hk$mfe$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
Nightcrawler <Dirtydeeds@dirtcheap.net> wrote:
Snip
In fact, anything sent there dies. Machine or biological.
The subject is a stupid "what if", anyway. Sort of like the crap you
would hear from a 6 year old.
Indeed. The closest to realism observer craft would be
a dirigible, not exposed to 90 bar, but only to 3-4.
But it would be "plankton", unmanouverable for all
practical purposes. But it could tell us a lot about
Venus by remote sensing.
Thank you. Your post almost made me wish I had an interest in this
subject.
walksalone whom will stick with mythology. There are enough head spinners
in that to keep me bemused.
CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as
they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the
Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Devil's dictionary