| Subject: No mineral has a round and concave habit |
| From: Wretch Fossil |
| Date: 18/12/2010, 13:48 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro.seti,alt.sci.seti,sci.med |
No mineral has a round and concave habit
Some people say I incorrectly identified minerals as red blood cells.
So, I quote Martill et al :
“…, as no diagenetic mineral has to date been reported with a
biconcave oblate spheroidal habit.” (note 1)
That habit is found only in red blood cells of mammals (note 2). It is
difficult to show biconcavity of particles embedded in meteorites. So,
I checked and found actually no mineral has a round and concave habit,
as shown in
Figure 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176949864&p=137
(note 3)
Please let me know if I was wrong.
Note 1: Article “Small spheres in fossil bones, blood corpuscles or
diagenetic products?” displayed at
http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2040/Pages%20619-624.pdf
(See Line 1 on Page 4)
Note 2: See Discussion in article “ Pennsylvanian anthracite contains
red blood cell remains of a Carboniferous mammal”, displayed at
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.com/2010/03/pennsylvanian-anthracite-contains-red_04.html
Note 3: The figure was published with my post “Nearly all meteorites
displayed on Ebay USA contains Martian mammalian fossils”, displayed
at
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.com/2010/08/nearly-all-meteorites-displayed-on-ebay.html
(See Fig. 1 of the July 21 post)