Subject: Re: Martian male reproductive tract found in meteorite?
From: Wretch Fossil
Date: 21/02/2011, 06:46
Newsgroups: sci.astro.seti,alt.sci.seti,sci.med

On 2月21日, 下午2時43分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2月18日, 下午7時56分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
 > On 2月18日, 下午4時23分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

New edition of the Feb. 18 addendum:
Added on Feb. 18, 2011:
Reasons for identifying epididymis remains in meteorite Lafayette

1. According to Wikipedia article (note 1), epididymis is part of the
male reproductive system. In humans, it is six meters long, tightly
coiled behind each testis. This human epididymis tubule micrograph
(Fig. 1):http://www.bu.edu/histology/p/16902lba.htmcloselyresembles
the Martian material (Fig. 2):http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1177150638&p=192
found in meteorite Lafayette (note 2).

2. No Earthly material/contaminants could have got into the meteorite
and formed “sperm and tubules” in Figure 2.

3. The origin of the above Martian material is not minerals or any
other non-life material for the following reasons:

(a) Phylosilicates, or clay, or asbestos may resemble the Martian
material on the nano/micron levels, but they are never found to show
the size and shape of whole “epididymis tubules” in Figure 2 above.

(b) Other minerals may possibly show the general shape of whole
“epididymis tubules”, but such minerals, on the nano/micron/crystal/
cell levels, do not show the morphology of phyloslicates, or clay, or
asbestos, or “epithelial cells” or “sperm” of Figure 2 above.

So, the only other non-life possibility is nonminerals that has no
life, such as amber, frozen carbon dioxide, man-made fibers, etc.
Again, these nonminerals have never been reported to resemble
epididymis tubules on both nano and micron levels.

In view of (a) and (b), the Martian material in Figure 2 must have had
its origin in an organism. As meteorite Lafayette has been confirmed
by NASA as originating from Mars, and in view of Point 1 and Point 2,
I can only conclude the Martian material in Figure 2 was Martian
animal fossil organ remains of epididymis. The Martian past life is
shown on four levels in Figure 2: on the organ level ( epididymis); on
the tissue level (epithelium and tubules); on the cell level (sperm
and epithelial cells); on the molecule level (flagellum of sperm). I
never saw a Martian fossil showing all four levels of life.

Note 1: Wikipedia article on epididymishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epididymis

Note 2: Free online article describing the Martian materialhttp://www.alphagalileo.org/AssetViewer.aspx?AssetId=41774&CultureCod

All my articles are here:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0-隱藏被引用文字 -

- 顯示被引用文字 -

Martian epididymis marked in details

Some people still could not recognize the cells on the Martian
epididymis tubules. So, I marked the details of the cells, showing
cell boundaries, cell bodies, nuclei, tubule lumen, etc. athttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1177164767&p=195

in the hope that people could compare the Martian material more
easily
with Earthly human epididymis tubule athttp://www.bu.edu/histology/p/16902lba.htm- 隱藏被引用文字 -

- 顯示被引用文字 -

Added on Feb. 21, 2011:
Unambiguous Martian epithelial cells

Electron images below show Martian and Earthly epithelial cells in
epididymis are almost the same in shape, although Earthly human
epididymis is 15 times wider than that of the Martian animal :
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1177179745&p=196


Source and credit for left image in above figure:
http://www.alphagalileo.org/AssetViewer.aspx?AssetId=41774&CultureCod
Source and credit for right image:
http://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000h98DbfPL_K4