| Subject: Wikipedia & geologists mistake muscle fossil for mineral plagioclase |
| From: Wretch Fossil |
| Date: 12/03/2011, 13:36 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.med,sci.med.cardiology |
Wikipedia & geologists mistake fossilized muscles for mineral
plagioclase
Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagioclase
use the following micrograph
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=22&f=1472462968&p=91
to represent mineral plagioclase.
In fact, the above micrograph shows fossilized muscle remains instead
of plagioclase.Meteorite researchers often confuse muscle remains with
plagioclase. For example, the following figures show muscle remains in
meteorites, rather than plagioclase in “lunar” meteorites:
Fig.1: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176846306&p=92
Fig.2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176846307&p=93
Fig.3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176846311&p=97
Fig.4:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176855457&p=103