| Subject: Arrogant scientists: Creation was not science. |
| From: Wretch Fossil |
| Date: 15/04/2011, 10:49 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.med,sci.med.cardiology |
Many scientists said Creation was not science. If so, why don’t they
create an inhabitable Mars, or a bird or a grass? Answer: No one can
ever do those things. The reasons are:
1.No humans can create a magnetic field for Mars.
2.No humans can create a soul for a bird or a grass. The souls of
humans, birds, grasses are within the bodies of such organisms just as
energy is within petroleum. Animal cells/organs are just physical
expressins of the souls. Living animal organs cannot be separated from
souls, which are unknown to scientists. Likewise, DNA is just like a
typewriter expressing the souls.
If there is no science in creation, why do we need any scientists to
create things? If there is no science in creation of life, how can
created beings fit into ecosystems for hundreds of million years? All
life exists owing to mutual help, not mutual warring.