On 10月23日, 下午7時03分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10月23日, 上午12時10分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr. Allen Treiman displayed a micrograph ofmeteoriteALH 84001 athttp://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/marslife/slide_22.html

I found numerous blood vesel remains in the image and labelled them inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1782866539&p=67

The above is negative effect of this photo:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1782866538&p=66

Reasons why they were blood vessels (added on Oct. 23, 2011):

1. No minerals curve and contain bulging dots in structures smaller
than 10 micrometers in diameter. Asbestos’ fibers are no larger than
one micrometer across. Asbestos don’t contain bulging dots in their
fibers or in bundles of fibers.
2. No bacteria or fungi or plant rootlets have so many minute
branches
(<4 micrometers across) in such small area.
3. No animal cells or tissues have such minute (<4 microns across)
branches bulging with round dots, except blood vessels and lymph
vessels. However, lymph vessels should be connected to lymph nodes,
which are not seen in the image.

So, blood vessels were the only real possibility.

A list of my postshttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Edited on Oct. 24, 2011: Reasons why they were blood vessels.

1.No minerals possess the shape and size of the “blood vessel
remains”, which branch, curve,contain bulging dots, and measure around
two micrometers in diameter.

2.No bacteria or fungi or plant rootlets have so many minute branches
(~2 micrometers across) in such small areas.

3.No animal cells or tissues have such minute (~2 microns across)
branches bulging with round dots, except blood vessels and lymph
vessels. Lymph vessels should be connected to lymph nodes, which are
not seen in the image.

So, blood vessels were the only real possibility.

A list of my posts: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0